The trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the banned Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), resumed on Friday at the Federal High Court in Abuja. Justice James Omotosho presided over the case after taking over from Justice Binta Nyako, who withdrew following allegations of bias from Kanu’s legal team.
Kanu Agabi, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), represented Kanu, while Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) stood for the Federal Government. The case against Kanu involves seven terrorism-related charges brought forward by the prosecution.
Why Did Justice Nyako Step Down?
Kanu and his legal team had repeatedly expressed concerns over Justice Nyako’s handling of the case. In response to their request for a new judge, the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, re-assigned the matter to Justice Omotosho. This move came after Kanu’s legal representatives accused the former judge of bias.
Kanu was first arrested on October 14, 2015, upon his return from the United Kingdom. Two years later, in 2017, he was granted bail due to health concerns but later fled Nigeria. In 2021, he was rearrested in Kenya and extradited back to Nigeria, where he has remained in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS).
Kanu’s Lawyer Apologizes in Court
At the latest court session, Kanu’s lead counsel, Agabi, began by offering an apology on behalf of his client. He admitted that Kanu had been overwhelmed by anger and had previously made comments that were inappropriate.
“They are now at a point where they must offer an apology,” Agabi said. He acknowledged that Kanu’s past verbal attacks on Justice Nyako, the prosecution team, and even his own defense lawyers were unjustified. The senior lawyer pleaded for understanding and urged all parties to let go of past grievances.
How Did the Court React?
Awomolo, the Federal Government’s lawyer, accepted the apology, assuring the court that the prosecution was committed to ensuring a swift trial. Justice Omotosho also weighed in, noting that the prolonged legal battle might have taken a toll on Kanu.
“When this trial started in 2015, the defendant was 47 years old. Now, at 57, he still does not know what the future holds for him. That uncertainty may have influenced his reactions,” the judge remarked.
The seven charges against Kanu were then read aloud in court, and he pleaded not guilty to all of them. The judge granted an accelerated hearing, considering that the case had dragged on for nearly a decade.
Upcoming Court Dates
The trial has now been scheduled to continue on April 29, May 2, and May 6, 2025.
What Was in Kanu’s Apology?
Agabi, reading from a prepared statement, conveyed Kanu’s regrets over his past outbursts.
“We must be cautious of our words when angered. Nnamdi Kanu has been angry for a long time, and in that state, he said things he should not have. He criticized the judge, the prosecution, and even his own legal team,” Agabi stated.
He continued, “He has authorized me to apologize on his behalf. He sincerely regrets his actions and wants to make amends.”
The apology extended to several individuals:
- Justice Binta Nyako – “She is a highly respected judge and did not deserve the criticism directed at her.”
- Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) – “As the chairman of the Body of Benchers, he is a man of humility and dedication. He deserves nothing but the highest regard.”
- Kanu’s own defense team – “Despite the harsh words, they continue to stand by him. That is a testament to their professionalism.”
Agabi further described Kanu as a man who stood by his beliefs, even when it cost him dearly. He acknowledged that while Kanu represented a cause dear to many, no one is above the law.
What This Means for the Case
The detail of Nnamdi Kanu court case has evolved significantly since his first arrest in 2015. With an accelerated trial schedule now in place, both the defense and prosecution are expected to present their arguments in the coming months.
Kanu’s apology in court could play a crucial role in shaping public perception and possibly influencing future legal proceedings. Whether this act of remorse will impact the final outcome remains uncertain, but it marks a shift in tone from the IPOB leader.
Key Takeaways from Today’s Proceedings
- Justice Nyako’s recusal paved the way for a new judge, addressing concerns raised by Kanu’s legal team.
- Kanu’s apology signals an attempt at damage control after previous confrontations in court.
- A fast-tracked trial schedule has been set, with hearings scheduled for April and May 2025.
As this high-profile case unfolds, all eyes will remain on the Federal High Court in Abuja. The next few months will be crucial in determining what lies ahead for Kanu and his long-standing legal battle.
